--Original published at Max'sPHY105blog
For this first impression post, I choose to comment on Dan Gilbert’s TED talk about happiness. Dan Gilbert’s talk was primarily about synthetic happiness, which Dan defines as happiness as a result of not getting what we want. I thought Dan’s speech was very informative. His ideas were backed up by outcomes of his experiments. What he was primarily saying was that happiness does not correspond to every good thing that happens in life. He began by asking a question what will make people feel happier later in life, wining the lottery or becoming paraplegic. In the short term, people are happier when they win the lottery and not happy when they become paraplegic, but in the long term, they both have the same amount of happiness. This leads me to believe that emotion is like a two way power bar with a positive side and a negative side. Every time something occurs in life that makes a person happy, his bar will move up toward the positive side of the bar, but as time passes, it will gradually go back down to where it was before. If something happens in life that makes a person feel sad, his bar will move down toward the negative side of the bar, but as time passes, it will gradually go back up to where it was before. I find this message to be very reliable, as I feel this all the time. There are things in life that bring me joy, but they only last so long. Eventually, I will be feeling the same way I did before. In this same way, I am able to get over things in life that do not make me happy.
Dan also talked about how free choice causes people to not be satisfied. He talked about an experiment he performed, in which he asked people to take two pictures and asked them to give one of them up. For some people he gave the option to, after a specified amount of time, reclaim the picture they had previously given up and give up the one they decided to keep. For others, he told them that they will never see the picture they give up again. After measuring how satisfied the people were after a few weeks, he found that people who were not given the option to switch pictures were very satisfied while the people who were given the option to switch their picture were not satisfied. This experiment proves Dan’s idea to be credible. It shows that free choice diminishes happiness. After thinking about this, I find this finding to be reasonable. I find that when I am just given something without any choice, I am often happy about it and try to continue enjoying it, but when I am given a choice between more than one thing, I might be satisfied with what I choose the moment I choose it, but later, as I get used to owning what I choose and I might become neutral about it and become dissatisfied with the decision I made.
These two facts about happiness, are vary useful. If I were to apply them to my life, I might prefer to simply get what I get instead of choosing. It now make sense to me why the saying, “Get what you get,” applies to people in their everyday lives. Happiness is not the result from free choice, but simply the result of what happens to people beyond their determination. This is a valuable idea that everyone should apply to their daily lives.