--Original published at Sherika's Psych Blog
In one of the mythbusters most iconic episodes where they compare whether the usage of a cellphone while driving compares to the dangers of drunk driving. In order to test hypothesis, the team set up a controlled experiment where the subject was both sober and wasn’t using a cellphone in order to be used to the course they had set up for the experiment.
The second experiment featured the subject being distracted due to a cellphone call. For the last variation of the experiment, the subject drank some alcoholic beverages and had their blood alcohol level examined with a breathalyzer test before driving the course again.
While these three different experiments were set up, there were of course, smaller criteria that existed within the experiments as detailed in the first controlled experiment that the team established. Within that experiment, they had the subject accelerate to 30 miles per hour and stopping at a marked point. After that the subject had to parallel park and avoid accidents. On top of this the experiments were timed as well.
During the cell phone portion of the experiment the subject was given different mental tasks to complete while also operating the car. Whether it was answering factual questions or more mathematically challenging questions. For this portion of the experiment, giving subjects mentally challenging tasks during the simulation of distracted driving due to cellphone usage was a weakness. Distracting the subject with factual or mentally stimulating questions doesn’t accurately recreate drivers everyday who are distracted due to the usage of their cellphones. Whether that be because the driver themselves are using their phone while driving or are getting distracted due to a phone call.
Instead of distracting the driver with mentally stimulating questions, it would have been more accurate for the subject to be holding a phone conversation instead that simulates the phone conversations that everyone has every day.
Another critique to be noted as that the blood alcohol level of the subjects tested wasn’t ever mentioned in the experiment. So it’s hard to determine if any of the subjects had the same blood alcohol level when they engaged in the test. This seems like a weakness as the two subjects in the study, because of age, sex, and weight could consume the same number of alcoholic drinks yet have differing blood alcohol levels that affected them differently. Instead, there should have been some sort of effort in order to get both subjects to either consume the same number of drinks or have blood alcohol levels that were close to each other.
Even though at the end of the video the mythbusters hypothesis was proven true that driving drunk and driving with a cellphone had similar margins for accidents. Whereas they had a larger margin of error for driving with a cellphone. Another thing to critique is that there was never any point of the video in which the mythbusters themselves addressed the criteria they were using to determine whether driving drunk was dangerous than a using a cellphone, vice versa, or with both. Instead, these criteria should have been mapped out at the beginning as it’s hard for the viewer to accept such things at face value.